- #SAMSUNG NVME DRIVER 960 PRO DRIVER#
- #SAMSUNG NVME DRIVER 960 PRO WINDOWS 10#
- #SAMSUNG NVME DRIVER 960 PRO PRO#
- #SAMSUNG NVME DRIVER 960 PRO SERIES#
The 960 Evo excels once it hits the 512KB test, where it crosses the 3000MB/s read speed threshold.
#SAMSUNG NVME DRIVER 960 PRO SERIES#
It offers a series of tests that throw different file sizes at our drives. ATTOĪTTO is the last benchmark in our suite. While the Evo is noticeably slower than the Pro, its read and write speeds are 74 percent faster than Seagate’s SATA-based drive.
#SAMSUNG NVME DRIVER 960 PRO PRO#
The 960 Pro really takes the lead in this benchmark, beating the Evo’s read and write performance by 43.1 and 8.7 percent, respectively. Like CrystalDiskMark, it also offers a sequential read and write test. The 960 Evo’s read and write speeds are 3.2 and 4.1 percent slower, respectively, but this is still really good when you consider that it costs 32.1 percent less and was able to outperform Samsung’s read speed claims by 2.8 percent.īoth NVMe drives are way faster than Seagate’s SATA-based SSD, which tops off with sequential read and write speeds of 547.2MB/s and 429MB/s. It’s the only drive to surpass the 3,500MB/s read threshold. It also happens to be a great test to measure a drive’s peak read and write performance.Īs you can see from the graph above, the 960 Pro offers both the fastest sequential read and write speeds. The program offers a sequential read and write test that simulates reading and writing one big continuous file, which is a scenario you might encounter if you edit video. CrystalDiskMarkĬrystalDiskMark is our first benchmark.
#SAMSUNG NVME DRIVER 960 PRO DRIVER#
We also used Samsung’s NVMe Driver 2.0 on both the 960 Pro and 960 Evo and formatted all the drives to NTFS, which is the most common storage configuration. For our tests, we used three different benchmarking programs: CrystalDiskMark, AS SSD, and ATTO.
#SAMSUNG NVME DRIVER 960 PRO WINDOWS 10#
We also added Seagate’s 240GB 600 Series SSD to represent a traditional SATA-based solution.įor our rig, we used a Windows 10 PC equipped with Intel’s 6700K CPU, Gigabyte GA-170X-Gaming-7 motherboard, and 16GB of Corsair Vengeance RAM clocked at 2133MHz. To evaluate the 960 Evo, we compared it to Samsung’s more premium 960 Pro, which is also an NVMe SSD. We tested those claims in our benchmarks below. Samsung claims that the 960 Evo is able to offer sequential read performance up to 3,200MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,900MB/s. This was a problem that plagued Samsung’s 2015-released 950 drives. Like the 960 Pro before it, the 960 Evo uses a thin copper heat spreader to mitigate heat and unwanted performance throttling under sustained workloads. Four of them are dedicated to the NAND and the remaining core is dedicated to optimizing communication between the controller and your computer. Not to be confused with AMD’s Polaris GPU micro-architecture, Samsung’s controller has five cores. The 960 Evo uses Samsung’s new Polaris controller to divvy out information to the various NAND modules. Another benefit to stacking NAND is that it outperforms more traditional planar NAND SSDs. Specifically, the 960 Evo offers 40 layers of NAND flash. Samsung’s V-NAND, however, stacks NAND on top of each other to reach higher densities. Traditionally, NAND is laid out across a flat plane. NAND flash is the component of the SSD that stores data, and MLC NAND represents a balanced compromise of speed, longevity, and capacity between the more premium SLC NAND and the cheaper TLC NAND. The 960 Evo uses the PCIe Gen 3.0 x 4 lane interface and 3-bit multi-level cell (MLC) V-NAND flash modules. The Samsung 960 Evo starts out at $129 for the 250GB SSD, but scales up to $479 for the 1TB version. Samsung 960 Specs SSDĥ12MB LPDDR3/1GB LPDDR3 (for 1TB version)ĥ12MB LPDDR3, 1GB LPDDR3 (for 1TB version), 2GB LPDDR3 (for 2TB version) For instance, the 960 Evo is only 2.38mm thick and can squeeze into small form factors like ultra-thin notebooks, as long as they support M.2. One advantage M.2 drives have is that they’re tiny. Samsung's 960 Pro and Evo drives use the compact M.2 form factor.
![samsung nvme driver 960 pro samsung nvme driver 960 pro](https://images.samsung.com/is/image/samsung/p5/semiconductor/minisite/ssd/products/consumer-ssd/nvme-ssd-960-pro-evo/3-960evo-pc.jpg)
Regardless of form factor, both NVMe form factors work over the PCIe bus. It is important to note that Samsung’s drives will require motherboards to have an M.2 slot. Intel’s 750 Series NVMe SSDs will take up a motherboard PCIe slot, but both of Samsung’s 960 series drives use the newer, small M.2 form factor.
![samsung nvme driver 960 pro samsung nvme driver 960 pro](https://www.tejar.pk/media/catalog/product/cache/3/image/500x/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/s/a/samsung_ssd_960_pro_nvme_m.24_-_tejar.jpg)
That’s over five times as fast as traditional SATA III SSDs. These drives can reach theoretical speeds up to 4GB/s. SSDs that use the Non-volatile memory express (NVMe) interface, however, use the faster PCIe express bus, which graphics cards also use. When you add in computing overhead, these SSDs typically peak out at around 550MB/s. Modern 2.5-inch SSDs use the SATA III interface, which limits drives to 6Gbp/s transfer speeds.